[newlib 04/22] bitset: rename confusing macro NAND to ANDNOT
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Wed Jun 22 08:24:27 UTC 2022
From: Ryan Libby <rlibby at FreeBSD.org>
s/BIT_NAND/BIT_ANDNOT/, and for CPU and DOMAINSET too. The actual
implementation is "and not" (or "but not"), i.e. A but not B.
Fortunately this does appear to be what all existing callers want.
Don't supply a NAND (not (A and B)) operation at this time.
Discussed with: jeff
Reviewed by: cem
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22791
---
newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/bitset.h | 4 ++--
newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/cpuset.h | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/bitset.h b/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/bitset.h
index 0334939c9..a1fd8b316 100644
--- a/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/bitset.h
+++ b/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/bitset.h
@@ -152,13 +152,13 @@
(d)->__bits[__i] = (s1)->__bits[__i] & (s2)->__bits[__i];\
} while (0)
-#define BIT_NAND(_s, d, s) do { \
+#define BIT_ANDNOT(_s, d, s) do { \
__size_t __i; \
for (__i = 0; __i < __bitset_words((_s)); __i++) \
(d)->__bits[__i] &= ~(s)->__bits[__i]; \
} while (0)
-#define BIT_NAND2(_s, d, s1, s2) do { \
+#define BIT_ANDNOT2(_s, d, s1, s2) do { \
__size_t __i; \
for (__i = 0; __i < __bitset_words((_s)); __i++) \
(d)->__bits[__i] = (s1)->__bits[__i] & ~(s2)->__bits[__i];\
diff --git a/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/cpuset.h b/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/cpuset.h
index 0d21f77fa..a8af67bac 100644
--- a/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/cpuset.h
+++ b/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/cpuset.h
@@ -177,16 +177,16 @@ static __inline void CPU_XOR(cpu_set_t *destset, const cpu_set_t *srcset1,
CPU_XOR_S(sizeof(*destset), destset, srcset1, srcset2);
}
-static __inline void CPU_NAND_S(size_t setsize, cpu_set_t *destset,
+static __inline void CPU_ANDNOT_S(size_t setsize, cpu_set_t *destset,
const cpu_set_t *srcset1, const cpu_set_t *srcset2)
{
- BIT_NAND2(_cpu_set_bits(setsize), destset, srcset1, srcset2);
+ BIT_ANDNOT2(_cpu_set_bits(setsize), destset, srcset1, srcset2);
}
-static __inline void CPU_NAND(cpu_set_t *destset, const cpu_set_t *srcset1,
+static __inline void CPU_ANDNOT(cpu_set_t *destset, const cpu_set_t *srcset1,
const cpu_set_t *srcset2)
{
- CPU_NAND_S(sizeof(*destset), destset, srcset1, srcset2);
+ CPU_ANDNOT_S(sizeof(*destset), destset, srcset1, srcset2);
}
static __inline int CPU_COUNT_S(size_t setsize, const cpu_set_t *set)
--
2.35.3
More information about the devel
mailing list