[PATCH] build: Make BUILD_LIBDL configurable

[Chris Johns]

On 10/8/2023 11:44 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 10.08.23 15:28, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> It looks ok but why? It isn't built if not supported. It isn't a lot of code
>> even if it is built. And it will not be in a user executable if they don't
>> call it.
>>
>> I just don't see the point.
> 
> Yes, good question. Actually, I wanted to add an option to disable the libdl
> tests as a workaround for
> 
> http://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4941
> 
> and the use of vendor tools or clang. I will make this more explicit with a
> BUILD_LIBDL_TESTS option.

Please do not add a work around.

Thanks
Chris