style question: breaking inline assembly lines
Gedare Bloom
gedare at rtems.org
Wed Jun 14 15:56:22 UTC 2023
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 8:51 AM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
> On 13.06.23 00:04, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > "b _ARM_Exception_default\n"
> > :
> > - : [cpufsz] "i" (sizeof(CPU_Exception_frame)),
> > - [cpuspoff] "i" (offsetof(CPU_Exception_frame, register_sp)),
> > - [v7mlroff] "i" (offsetof(ARMV7M_Exception_frame, register_lr)),
> > - [cpuvecoff] "J" (offsetof(CPU_Exception_frame, vector)),
> > - [cpuvfpoff] "i" (ARM_EXCEPTION_FRAME_VFP_CONTEXT_OFFSET),
> > - [cpacr] "i" (ARMV7M_CPACR),
> > - [vfpsz] "i" (ARM_VFP_CONTEXT_SIZE)
> > + : [cpufsz] "i"( sizeof( CPU_Exception_frame ) ),
>
> If we place operators (e.g. &&, ||, ...) at the end of a broken line,
> then we should do this for the : as well.
>
> My current preference would be to format all non-third-party sources
> with a standard clang-format selection. I guess in the long run, this
> will be the easiest approach to maintain. If we use exotic options, then
> we may up ending as clang-format maintainers.
>
The options supported since clang-16 are what I suggested:
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.html#breakbeforeinlineasmcolon
Breaking a newline after the : is not directly supported. It would
seem to be easy to add to clang-format if that's what we want.
I think I'm about 20% of the way toward being a clang-format maintainer already.
> --
> embedded brains GmbH
> Herr Sebastian HUBER
> Dornierstr. 4
> 82178 Puchheim
> Germany
> email: sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
> fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
>
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
> Registernummer: HRB 157899
> Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
> Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
> https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
More information about the devel
mailing list