[PATCH] 6: Use GCC 13.2

[Chris Johns]

On 12/9/2023 4:43 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 12.09.23 08:40, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 12/9/2023 4:31 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 27.07.23 13:33, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>>> Prepare for RTEMS 6.1 release.
>>>>
>>>> Update #4921.
>>> How do we want to proceed with the tools for the RTEMS 6.1 release?
>> I need to move 6 to tar files but other tickets have taken what time I had.
> 
> The patch uses a tar file for GCC. 

Oh sorry then I am fine.

> I guess for Newlib we have to host an archive.

I am more relaxed about newlib because it's release cycle is difficult to line
up for us at a functional level. Long term the key things for gcc is being to
raise bug reports knowing the exact tarfile we have used.

>>
>>> Is GCC 13.2 still the desired GCC release?
>> What is the alternative?
> 
> Do we need one? GCC 13.2 is the best option from my point of view right now.
> 

Sorry I was wondering if you have something else in mind.

Chris