umon3.0

[Gedare Bloom]

Some questions:
Do you plan to embed the version number within the repo? Or only on the release?

Do you intend to call the development version the same as what the
release will be? This can be confusing for users, if they grab a
development head of 3.0 and then it is updated a few more times before
the release. There are varying ways to approach this issue.

Gedare


On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Ed Sutter
<ed.sutter at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> Anyone,
> Any objections to starting this new uMon tree off as uMon3.0?
> History disallows me from using any major number less than '3'.
> Speak now or...  well, you know.
>
> Ed
> _______________________________________________
> umon-devel mailing list
> umon-devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/umon-devel