can we include dosfs?

Chris Johns chrisj at
Mon Jun 20 02:33:05 UTC 2016

On 20/06/2016 12:24, Ben Gras wrote:
> I'm looking at building umon from RSB, to replace uboot, the next step
> to mainlining all the beagle bsp support.


> It seems umon doesn't read FAT filesystems. Does anyone see any
> license objection to including
> dosfs.c ( as seems to have happened
> with the original umon?

How does that implementation compare with This is used by Xilinx in the 
first stage bootloader.

I also have a JFFS bootloader implementation that can be added so umon 
can be booted from a JFFS2.

> Can we then include the original umon CLI interface or is that a
> license issue? If so I can re-implement it.

I do not know and yes it would be nice to use what is available.


More information about the umon-devel mailing list