pc386 i386ex Rtems Make issues?
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com
Tue Jun 27 18:00:46 UTC 2000
John Jeffers wrote:
> configure i386-rtems ..... i386ex was issued. This completed as expected.
> make RTEMS_BSP="pc386 i386ex"
I assume you did --enable-rtemsbsp="pc386 i386ex" on the configure line
> resulted in a number of issues (I put stdio to a log file but stderr did
> not go)
Try this :)
make >logfile 2>&1 &
tail -f logfile
> 1) I used the posted i386 Linux RPM's which built out to /opt/rtems on
> RH6.2 and have not tried to fix for 386 soft float issues but I did not
> expect to encounter them on a OS build. Is this really the issue with the
> following or do I have Other finger problems?
> i386ex/lib/linkends:115:parse error o-optimize/hello.exe
> resulting in premature termination: exit error 1
Somehow this typo crept in to the i386ex linkcmds. This is a specific
problem with this file and this BSP. It is not the soft FP problem.
That only impacts the ts386ex BSP.
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11
--- startup/linkcmds 1999/11/17 17:50:46 1.10
+++ startup/linkcmds 2000/06/14 13:08:41 1.11
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
* found in the file LICENSE in this distribution or at
- * $Id: linkcmds,v 1.10 1999/11/17 17:50:46 joel Exp $
+ * $Id: linkcmds,v 1.11 2000/06/14 13:08:41 joel Exp $
* Memory layout:
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
__DTOR_END__ = .;
- _rodata_start 5 . ;
+ _rodata_start = . ;
_erodata = ALIGN( 0x10 ) ;
> (As a note the expected termination could be in the "Getting Started with
> RTEMS for C/C++ Users" eg.Results in ....... Use Make all etc. for Config
> result this would result in less head scratching for newbies at the cost of
> ether a line of print each, alternately terminating each master script or
> makefile with "Success :<filename>" as a comment has worked for me.)
Aaaaa... the normal output of bit_rtems is included but not a
regular old configure and make.. good suggestion.
> 2) Is this expected?
> rtems-4.5.0-beta3a/c/src/exec/score/cpu/i386/cpu_asm and
> rtems.s from asm.h:52
> warning undefining 'Register_PREFIX"
Expected. gcc was/is wrong about its value. __REGISTER_PREFIX__
is set to nothing on this gcc port and it should be "%".
> Which also occurred in:
> libcpu cpu_asm.S, cpu_Model.s, start.S, irq_asm.S:14, time_isr.S:34
All assembly files get this because of above.
> Also the following BSP issues
> ne2000.c issued 'ne_init_hardware'
> ne2000.c:446 'warning assignment from incompaitable pointer type'
Not ideal but not a problem.
> uipc_mbuf.c:53 'mbinit static not defined'
> linkaddr.c:63 '%ax' instead of %eax due to 'w' suffix'
I don't see either of these in my last build logs. Could you
> 3) Am I supposed to put the tarred examples in any specific place before
> the Make. The Getting Started does not seem to indicate this and in
> Section 6 alludes to there not being any at this stage?
But note that they probably do not define enough tasks since
the minimums were changed.
> Thanks John
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel at OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
More information about the users