binutils-2.11-2 RPMs available

[Joel Sherrill]

The patch is OK but the -2 RPMs are exactly the same as the -1's
due to a stupid human error.  The .spec line that applied the
patch was commented out to produce the -1's and I forgot to
uncomment it before making the -2's .

ALso James Housley has discovered that the sh-rtems binutils
blows up when building gcc.  So we now have 1 real bug 
and un-applied patch to report.

Joel Sherrill wrote:
> 
> In updating the FreeBSD ports, James Housley noticed that
> a patch I had submitted did not make the release.  Because
> of that a couple of ports were using coff instead of elf.
> This new set of RPMs fixes that.  They are in
> 
> ftp://ftp.oarcorp.com/pub/rtems/snapshots/c_tools/binutils-2.11-2
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
> joel at OARcorp.com                 On-Line Applications Research
> Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
>    Support Available             (256) 722-9985

-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel at OARcorp.com                 On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
   Support Available             (256) 722-9985