binutils-2.11-2 RPMs available
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com
Mon Apr 9 22:34:05 UTC 2001
The patch is OK but the -2 RPMs are exactly the same as the -1's
due to a stupid human error. The .spec line that applied the
patch was commented out to produce the -1's and I forgot to
uncomment it before making the -2's .
ALso James Housley has discovered that the sh-rtems binutils
blows up when building gcc. So we now have 1 real bug
and un-applied patch to report.
Joel Sherrill wrote:
> In updating the FreeBSD ports, James Housley noticed that
> a patch I had submitted did not make the release. Because
> of that a couple of ports were using coff instead of elf.
> This new set of RPMs fixes that. They are in
> Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
> joel at OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
> Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
> Support Available (256) 722-9985
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel at OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
More information about the users