code size latest snapshop versus 200206

till strauman at slac.stanford.edu
Thu Feb 27 16:32:10 UTC 2003


Joel Sherrill wrote:

>
>till wrote:
>
>>Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>>>Chris Johns wrote:
>>>
>>>>Till Straumann wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>It's not clear who is really responsible for the net increase
>>>>>as some things got bigger and some new symbols appear but other
>>>>>symbols shrunk or disappeared.
>>>>>There is also noticable fluctuation among small items.
>>>>>
>>>>I agree. Most items are small excluding the _vfiprintf_r/_vfprintf_r etc. Some call
>>>>must have been added to bring these in.
>>>>
>>>>Not sure why the change has happened.
>>>>
>>>If the references to _vfiprintf_r/_vfprintf_r are new, then
>>>please use the -Map option to ld to find out what is rerfercing it
>>>and forcing it in.
>>>
>>Hmm - I didn't look at the -Map yet but my guess is that hello world
>>calls printf who probably
>>wraps _vfprintf_r, the latter referencing _vfiprintf_r
>>
>
>Is the newlib version changing between these two points?  
>
yes - I don't have the exact version numbers at hand, though.

-- Till


>
>
>>---Till.
>>
>>>
>>>I am in the middle of building tools so am not in a good position to
>>>check other targets.  What BSP are you using Peter?  If not a PPC one,
>>>then it is likely some shared support code and we need to find it and
>>>reduce the dependencies.
>>>
>>>
>>>>--
>>>> Chris Johns, cjohns at cybertec.com.au
>>>>
>






More information about the users mailing list