Passing vector number (was Re: API modification request)

Sergei Organov osv at
Tue Feb 4 12:45:08 UTC 2003

Valette Eric <eric.valette at> writes:
> I would tend to agree with Till : my personnal feeling is that the vector
> itself is useless so I would vote for either a void* or nothing (sorry
> joel).

Vector itself *is* sometimes useful. I've recently wrote code for MPC8260
where every of SCC1...SCC4 controllers generates its own vector and it is
useful in this case. However, void* (or rtems_isr_arg_t) is more general
anyway so I'd vote for it.


More information about the users mailing list