Passing vector number (was Re: API modification request)

[Sergei Organov]

Eric Valette <eric.valette at free.fr> writes:
> Sergei Organov wrote:
> > Eric Valette <eric.valette at free.fr> writes:
> >>Sergei Organov wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Please keep in mind that unfortunately you don't see all the code. There
> >>>could be proprietary code that relies on features you change...
> >>
> >>Using such argument, you will never change anything.
>
> > No. It only implies that one should better think "I better don't change
> > this unless I have valuable reasons to" instead of "Why don't change this
> > if nobody seems to use it anyway?".
> 
> Hey
> 	1) there was a smiley in my message!

I've noticed that, but it was attached to the next phrase, not to those I've
commented about :-)

> 	2) I think we have come to the conclusion that a void* is indeed a
> more powerfull API with little performance impact (as you can cast the void*
> to an int to get your vector number).

Don't know about others, but I definitely agree.

BR,
Sergei.