code size latest snapshop versus 200206

[Joel Sherrill]

Peter Mueller wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi,
> 
> just finished the upgrade to the latest snapshot. I first checked the
> application size. Here are the results:
> 
> New:
> m68k-rtems-size o-optimize/mp3.nxe
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>  278112    8448   18672  305232   4a850 o-optimize/mp3.nxe
> 
> Old:
> m68k-rtems-size ../mp3-mit-ss200206/o-optimize/mp3.nxe
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>  259296    5936   41840  307072   4af80
> ../mp3-mit-ss200206/o-optimize/mp3.nxe
> 
> Any idea where the difference could come from?

Here's a core dump of ideas.

The toolset version might have changed.  If this is a change from newlib
1.10.0 -> 1.11.0, then some reorganization might had hurt things. :(

Some file got more functionality.  That's a pretty hefty change though.

How do the sizes of minimum, hello, and ticker compare?

The next step is to look at a sorted symbol table and look for growth.
That's what we usually do.

Which BSP is this?  The BSP could have introduced a new dependency
unintentionally.

> Thanks
> Peter
> 
> - --
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE+XS/WUzCcwYQMTJoRAsZeAJ9fFxTPvKoHiMPcG7yvaEUlEmGwiACffHDG
> cwhVbgnHF8qUqCQC0IN4tIk=
> =Lrsk
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----