Improvements to DOSFS

Chris Johns cjohns at
Thu Jul 31 22:39:51 UTC 2003

Eugeny Mints wrote:
> Unfortunately, yes. Of course, I had understood (and understand:) how it
> is ugly:(. Of course, it was temporary stub which I was going to improve
> as soon as possible - but you know: there are no more constant things
> than temporary:) So, of course it is necessary to implement some
> extendible (at run time) pool of buffers "for ata requests" with
> predefined initial size: then
> areq = malloc(sizeof(ata_req_t));
> will look like:
> areq = get_buf_from_ata_req_pool();

Thanks for the response. I understand the issues when getting things going and 
wanted to know if this is something that we need to look into.

  Chris Johns, cjohns at

More information about the users mailing list