Interrupt vector sharing
cjohns at cybertec.com.au
Fri Mar 14 03:43:21 UTC 2003
gregory.menke at gsfc.nasa.gov wrote:
> I've been thinking a bit about how to handle the shared interrupt
> issue. It seems to me the existing powerpc/shared irq handling code
> could be augmented to include a new function;
> int BSP_install_rtems_shared_irq_handler
> (const rtems_irq_connect_data* irq)
What about "BSP_install_rtems_add_handler" ?
This is what Solaris's DDI uses. See:
If shared ints are not supported, only allow one addition and return an error if more
Why is BSP_* used ?
Would CPU_* have been a better prefix to use ?
> Unless there are strong objections, I think I'll give the
> modifications a try.
I am not objecting, just tring to keep the growth of new functions for specific cases
when maybe one could be used.
Chris Johns, cjohns at cybertec.com.au
More information about the users