gcc 3.2.3/newlib 1.11.0 Binaries out
eric.valette at free.fr
Sat May 24 08:46:05 UTC 2003
Joel Sherrill wrote:
> I asked the newlib maintainer about the possibility of a release and he
> had no immediate plans for one. If you can provide a nice argument for
> making one, the possibility is always there. I was not completely aware
> of all changes that a release would address.
Well neither am I. Just I looked at the various changelog and CVS
history while hunting the ix86 bug and saw that a lot of things have
been done (mostly new code addition) and also some FP fixes...
> I would prefer to go with a real newlib release. And knowing the newlib
> maintainer, a good argument will result in one.
I have no problem with that. I was just making a suggestion. BTW, the
CVS newlib has some but not all the patches you have for the 1.11
version (from memory some ARM stuff is missing).
More information about the users