gcc 3.2.3/newlib 1.11.0 Binaries out

[Joel Sherrill]

Angelo Fraietta wrote:

> Joel Sherrill  wrote:
>
>> Grrrr.... I actually generated a gcc-3.2.3-rtems-20030507a.diff
>> that included these!  I even updated setup.def for the scripts.
>> Then I apparently forgot to run make before building the RPMs.
>>
>> I just put the "a" version of the diff on the ftp site and am 
>> spinning new RPMs.
>>
>> Angelo, these patches are independent of the i386 one.  How is
>> this working for you?
>>  
>>
> It is working fine. I build the gcc and newlib from the source -- i.e. 
> I don't use the RPMs
> I used
> gcc-3.2.3.tar.bz2
> gcc-3.2.3-rtems-20030507.diff
> newlib-1.11.0-rtems-20030507.diff
> newlib-1.11.0.tar.gz

This is what matters.  The RPM naming/revision scheme just give a 
convenient way
to refer to a tool set with patches.  The only difference between this 
and the next spin
will be Ralf's two patches I meant to include. :(  They are cooking now 
but the
new gcc patch gcc-3.2.3-rtems-20030507a.diff is already in the 
snapshots/c_tools
directory.

>
>