gcc 3.2.3/newlib 1.11.0 Binaries out
corsepiu at faw.uni-ulm.de
Tue May 27 04:10:20 UTC 2003
Am Die, 2003-05-27 um 01.36 schrieb Angelo Fraietta:
> Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Angelo Fraietta wrote:
> > This is what matters. The RPM naming/revision scheme just give a
> > convenient way
> > to refer to a tool set with patches. The only difference between this
> > and the next spin
> > will be Ralf's two patches I meant to include. :( They are cooking
> > now but the
> > new gcc patch gcc-3.2.3-rtems-20030507a.diff is already in the
> > snapshots/c_tools
> > directory.
> So do I need to use this?
I'd recommend to do so, because both patches fix two quite essential
bugs in gcc, one these is a general one affecting all cross-gccs and
other one is RTEMS-specific.
However, if you haven't seen them taking effect, you don't "necessarily
have to upgrade".
More information about the users