Bug in rtems_task_set_priority()

Thomas Rauscher trauscher at loytec.com
Fri Feb 6 18:43:17 UTC 2004

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kenneth Peters [mailto:Kenneth.J.Peters at jpl.nasa.gov] 
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 5:20 PM
> To: Thomas Rauscher
> Cc: rtems-users at rtems.com
> Subject: RE: Bug in rtems_task_set_priority()
> It looks like the main line of code leading to 4.6 has a fix 
> (since 2001, 
> actually) similar to what Thomas has suggested. All the 
> semaphore/mutex 
> routines were streamlined at the same time, so it's hard to tell by 
> inspection whether the problem I was having is fixed, but it 
> looks like 
> using non-priority-inheriting binary semaphores would do what I want.

Confirmed. The main line addresses this problem in quite the same way
my patch suggestion did. Although I couldn't run my testcase for PR551
on 4.6, I'm quite confident that the problem is fixed in there.

Best regards,

Thomas Rauscher
LOYTEC electronics GmbH
Stolzenthalergasse 24/3
A-1080 Wien
trauscher at loytec.com
Phone: +43-1-4020805-15
FAX:   +43-1-4020805-99

More information about the users mailing list