volatile in struct

Angelo Fraietta afraiett at bigpond.net.au
Wed Feb 18 19:29:45 UTC 2004


Sergei Organov wrote:

>Angelo Fraietta <afraiett at bigpond.net.au> writes:
>  
>
>>Sergei Organov wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>The questions being discussed are not what particular compiler does, but
>>>primarily what is guaranteed and what's not according to the C/C++
>>>standards. Surprisingly enough sometimes some people still care about
>>>standards conformance ;)
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Try comp.lang.c++ for discussing what is guaranteed by the c++ language
>>standard.
>>    
>>
>
>Thanks, but why did you say that, -- did I discuss it here?!
>
>  
>
Sorry, Maybe I misunderstood. I though that that was what you were 
saying that you wanted to discuss

primarily what is guaranteed and what's not according to the C/C++

If that is what you want to discuss, comp.lang.c++ are right up to speed 
on what was guaranteed by volatile. Either way, I'll try to endeavour to 
help you in whatever way I can.

-- 
Angelo Fraietta

PO Box 859
Hamilton NSW 2303

Home Page


http://www.users.bigpond.com/angelo_f/

There are those who seek knowledge for the sake of knowledge - that is CURIOSITY
There are those who seek knowledge to be known by others - that is VANITY
There are those who seek knowledge in order to serve - that is LOVE
    Bernard of Clairvaux (1090 - 1153)






More information about the users mailing list