alarm / setitimer question and serial record communication
norume at aps.anl.gov
Wed Sep 22 14:40:15 UTC 2004
On Sep 22, 2004, at 9:26 AM, Peter Dufault wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2004, at 9:12 AM, Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp.com> wrote:
>> My answer in cases like this is always to fix the RTEMS implementation
>> to match the expected standard behavior. Provide test case and
>> documentation updates.
> I agree, but I'm surprised "alarm()" doesn't seem to interrupt the
> thread. Am I missing something or is that how it is?
You are correct.
RTEMS does not provide a full POSIX signal handing environment (and
should not IMHO since it's a real mess).
Eric Norum <norume at aps.anl.gov>
Advanced Photon Source
Argonne National Laboratory
More information about the users