Making Rtems Device Drivers using C?

[Angelo Fraietta]

Chris Johns wrote:

> Overhead is not the issue. Joel is making a general point about C++ 
> and device drivers, and to be more specific drivers with interrupts. 
> You need to know more about what is happening to make the code work as 
> you expect. 

> For example you can not throw exceptions from an ISR and catch them in 
> a task, and accessing a STL container in an ISR could result in the 
> code trying to lock a mutex, or there could be temporary objects that 
> try to use the heap. I suspect there are more conditions.

True to a point, but that is not specific to the language. Eg, you can't 
call malloc from an interrupt in C code.

>> Michael Barr, in book cited below,  states that C++ is preferable due 
>> to its type-safety. Overhead can be controlled by avoiding things 
>> such as templates.
>>
>> 1.    Barr, M., Programming embedded systems in C and C++. 1999, 
>> Sebastopol, Calif.: O'Reilly. xvii, 174.
>>
>
> Not sure I agree with the last statement about templates.

The main issue I believe is code bloat. Another article is below.

http://www.embedded.com/98/9802fe3.htm

-- 
Angelo Fraietta

PO Box 859
Hamilton NSW 2303

Home Page


http://www.users.bigpond.com/angelo_f/

There are those who seek knowledge for the sake of knowledge - that is CURIOSITY
There are those who seek knowledge to be known by others - that is VANITY
There are those who seek knowledge in order to serve - that is LOVE
    Bernard of Clairvaux (1090 - 1153)