PowerPC architecture: Which processors have 8 BAT registers?
dufault at hda.com
Tue Mar 1 22:16:37 UTC 2005
On Mar 1, 2005, at 3:56 PM, Till Straumann wrote:
> PLEASE don't - this will get us into the multilib swamp again.
> Consider a run-time check for CPU version that generates an error
> if the CPU executing the code doesn't support the additional BATs.
> AFAIK, the init-code testing the CPU version would also have to
> enable the additional bats, wouldn't it?
I don't know, I don't know about BATs yet.
I thought about a run-time check, but I didn't know the multilib swamp
had been drained yet. In making changes to shared projects I try to
match the existing code base. And back in the multilib swamp, there's
the advantage of link time errors and small code for small targets with
In my own code I usually invert the conditional test so that more and
more definitions result in smaller code, and no definitions results in
the largest and most general. That's not the way RTEMS is currently,
but the approach is only a mind-set.
If the new code was conditional but added run time tests would you be
HD Associates, Inc.
More information about the users