Random problem (that is, problem with random())

[Peter Dufault]

On Mar 28, 2005, at 9:00 AM, Sergei Organov wrote:

>
> Thus, random() is BSD beast, not ISO or POSIX.
>
> ISO C equivalent is called rand().
>

Good point.  As is well known, "classic" rand() has its own problems, 
plus I still don't understand why the definition of random() isn't 
being published since it is in the header.  It must need a 
feature-enabling define before it shows up in the name space.

Peter

>
Peter Dufault
HD Associates, Inc.