New tools and 18.104.22.168
ralf.corsepius at rtems.org
Fri Apr 28 11:32:25 UTC 2006
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:56 +1100, Steven Johnson wrote:
> >LibChip is pretty much useless for me, and I would prefer not to build
Why? Except of a couple of seconds of build time, it doesn't cost you
> There is no option to not build LibChip, although the ./configure
> >system indicates it would be desirable. I agree. Currently a ATA
> >driver in libchip wont build for me, I think because I'm using a bare
This would qualify as a bug. libchip must build for every target.
> It would be useful for me to just disable it. Any chance of this
> >becoming an option so i wont have to patch the source tree to remove it
> >from the build?
> This one does what it should, but I think it could be better. At the
> very least I think this should be the default behavior for "bare" BSP's.
FWIW: the bare BSP's are not unlikely to fade out.
More information about the users