Signal handler & mutex, condition
Marek Prochazka
Marek.Prochazka at scisys.co.uk
Tue Jun 27 21:49:50 UTC 2006
Hi,
>>I also assume that the timer implementation uses asynchronous signal
>>routines (ASRs). The RTEMS manual however says that "ASRs execute in the
>>context of a task and may execute any directive."
>
> You would have assumed badly especially since you could have read the
> source code.
>
> Regular TSRs are invoked as part of processing the clock tick interrupt
> handler and thus execute outside the context of any task/thread.
thanks for the reply - I haven't have time to investigate more and look into the source code. The documentation is somewhat unclear in this respect.
>>My interpretation of this is that I do not have to worry about the use
>>of mutexes and conditions in a timer service routine (and hence a POSIX
>>timer callback). Any thoughts on this, please?
>
> You do have to worry about them -- you can't block at all during a TSR.
O.K., but the problem is that RTEMS doesn't implement the SIGEV_THREAD way of implementation (as far as I know), so it is hard to use timers for many types of applications as the execution environment for signal handlers is too restrictive.
Thanks,
Marek
--joel
>Thanks,
>Marek
>
>
>
More information about the users
mailing list