gettimeofday seconds rollover problem?
joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com
Wed Mar 1 15:25:49 UTC 2006
Eric Norum wrote:
> I think that we're nearing a consensus:
> 1) Add "memory" barrier to architecture-independent interrupt enable/
> disable/flash macros.
> 2) Specify "cc" in m68k interrupt enable/disable/flash macros.
> 3) Add volatile qualifiers as needed.
> I've committed (2).
It looks like it only got committed to the trunk. It also needs to be
on the 4.6 branch.
Does gcc 3.2 exhibit the movement behavior?
> Joel, will you take care of (1)?
Yes. I have a funeral this morning but will try to get to it before
close of business.
Was the suggestion of adding it to include/rtems/score/isr.h OK in
with making RTEMS_COMPILER_MEMORY_BARRIER a compiler dependent
> I guess that (3) will be dealt with whenever someone gets a chance...
I will double check a couple of obvious candidates but some already were
More information about the users