4.6 Barrier Patch for Review

Joel Sherrill joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com
Thu Mar 2 16:23:31 UTC 2006

Thomas Doerfler wrote:

> Joel,
> nearly, but no. (sorry).

That's what the review request was for. :)

> I think the _Thread_Unnest_dispatch function still does it the wrong 
> way round:

This should be fixed along with Eric Norum's suggestion about not 
needing the
do/while in the BARRIER macro.

Did Mattias and Elena get to play in the snow this week?  We peeked in
on the webcam in Marienplatz and it looked quite snowy a few days ago.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: barrier2.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4203 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060302/532e2138/attachment-0001.bin>

More information about the users mailing list