joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com
Thu Mar 29 20:20:26 UTC 2007
Jiri Gaisler wrote:
> I suggest that you try this version:
> There was a patch against too early irq enabling some time ago.
> I remember it was initially provided by Saab, so you should be
> aware of it...?
I don't see a patch like this in our source. Someone at the class mentioned
your version has some patches we don't have yet.
I didn't want to ping you publicly for a sync up but this looks like as good
a time as any. :)
A 4.7.1 is certainly going to happen and it is clear the the head will
And as much as I hate to do another 4.6 release, this likely could
> Sergei Organov wrote:
>> "Johan Zandin" <johan.zandin at space.se> writes:
>>> _Context_Switch( &executing->Registers, &heir->Registers );
>>> executing = _Thread_Executing;
>>> _ISR_Disable( level ); -----+
>>> | Region where
>>> } | an occuring
>>> | interrupt
>>> _Thread_Dispatch_disable_level = 0; | causes problems
>>> _ISR_Enable( level ); -----+
>> But how interrupt can occur when it's disabled in this region?! If
>> _ISR_Disable()/_ISR_Enable() don't work on your target, you have hard
>> trouble anyway.
>> -- Sergei.
>> rtems-users mailing list
>> rtems-users at rtems.com
> rtems-users mailing list
> rtems-users at rtems.com
More information about the users