instruction access exception
ralf.corsepius at rtems.org
Wed May 9 12:31:12 UTC 2007
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 13:50 +0200, Ingolf Steinbach wrote:
> > This disclaimer is at odds with sending a message to a public list.
> > It was never intended to be private or confidential and was also
> > immediately archived.
> As this issue pops up again and again in mailing lists, I suggest
> to complain to those who are responsible for these disclamers
> in the first place rather than to the poor individuals who question
> the use of the disclamer, too.
Please talk to your managers, sys-admins or simply get yourself a
> I am sure that it is not only *me* who is urged by company policy
> to include it. Although I'd prefer to use my old 4-line signature,
> I'm sorry to inform you that I won't be able to revert to *that*
Please understand that it's not possible for me to answer any of your
questions because I illegally received a copy of your mail.
More information about the users