What is "no" application? nm?

[Till Straumann]

Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 10:39 +0300, Leon Pollak wrote:
>   
>> On Monday, 31 בMarch 2008, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>     
>>> I am not using kdevelop - Last time I tried, kdevelop could not handle
>>> cross-compilation :/
>>>       
>> It handles cross-compilation really good for some (long) time.
>> It is very fast and handy. 
>> A bit clumsy debugger interface, but I recommend it.
>>
>>
>>     
>>>> Still, I see rather many changes in the basic libcpu code, BSP and some
>>>> things do not work, although worked in 4.7.
>>>> Still struggling with them, and if somebody needs my experience...
>>>>         
>>> My advise: Dump kdevelop.
>>>       
>> Thanks...:) Will not follow it :))
>>     
>
> Choose your poison. 
>
> To me, kdevelop is a semi-functional "greasy kid toy" - Last time I
> checked, it had not been able to import foreign projects, produced junk
> auto*tool support files and did only support one target-at-time
> compilation.
>  
>   
>> For example, there was no usage of Cpu_table.exceptions_in_RAM in none of 
>> mpc8xxx BSPs.
>>     
IIRC, psim is the only target using 'exceptions_in_RAM == FALSE'.
Note, however, that the name is misleading. It only refers to the 
address where the
exception vectors are (in_RAM=TRUE -> zero, in_RAM=FALSE -> high address).
However, the (IMHO not so-) wonderful 'new-exceptions' model *always* 
requires
the vector table to be writable (met by psim, of course) so the vector table
cannot be in ROM...

HTH
-- Tiill
> This has nothing to do with your current issue.
>
> The powerpc guys (Thomas, Till, Joel) are the persons to answer.
>
> Ralf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-users mailing list
> rtems-users at rtems.com
> http://rtems.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>