Mingw Tools 4.7

[Mick Davis]

Hi

If a compiler upgrade is on the cards, can I request that the coldfire 
-m5307 is added as a target?

We found for our application it resulted in a measurable performance 
improvement.


Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 14:32 +0800, Paul Whitfield wrote:
>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 11:57 +0800, Paul Whitfield wrote:
> 
>>> There have been quite a number of reports related to "gcc-4.2.x ICE'ing
>>> for m68k targets" on all kind of build-hosts, which makes it very likely
>>> for your issues not to be related to MinGW at all.
>>>
>>> Could you provide further details about the ICE you are observing?
>> I have reported it via the rtems Bugzilla.
>>
>> https://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1281
>>
>> Let me know if you need any more details.
> 
> I can reproduce your bug on linux, by recompile your *.i both with
> the latest m68k-rtems4.8-gcc (i.e. gcc-4.2.2) and with the
> m68k-rtems4.7-gcc, but can NOT reproduce the bug using m68k-rtems4.9-gcc
> (i.e. gcc-4.3.0) on Fedora.
> 
> So, I presume upstream already has fixed this bug.
> 
> IMO, it's time to consider upgrading the m68k-rtems-4.8 toolchain to
> gcc-4.3.0 :-)
> 
> 
> Ralf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-users mailing list
> rtems-users at rtems.com
> http://rtems.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
> 

-- 

Mick Davis
Goanna Technologies Pty Ltd
+61 8 9444 2634

"Shock your lizard today!"