plugin first steps

Robert Fu robert.fu at live.com
Sat Nov 22 20:40:58 UTC 2008


Hi Daron,
> However, upon closer analysis, it became clear that in order to > maintain a useful degree of independence from the RTEMS build-system > and maximum flexibility, the Managed Build approach is *the* way to go.
Agreed. I also thought about whether we need support "Standard Makefile" 
type of project.
 
Beside the CVS repo you mentioned earlier, the official CDT release also come
with CDT source code, and being able to browsing and debugging/tracing into 
CDT source code helped me in the development.
 
If you and Sebastian send me the error messages, commands invoked and 
the Makefile generated  for the HelloWorld example on your system (via private 
email, not the whole list), perhaps I can better understand what problems 
you're currently facing on your system.
 
Thanks,
Robert Fu
> From: daronchabot at gmail.com> Subject: Re: plugin first steps> Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:16:49 -0600> To: robert.fu at live.com> CC: sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de; rtems-users at rtems.org> > > On 22-Nov-08, at 3:38 AM, Robert Fu wrote:> > > For the "first steps" type of references, there is also another > > place contains> > more detailed information: "Managed Build System Extensibility > > Document"> > (mentioned in referrence section in my previous email) contains a > > section called> > "Tutorial: An Example Tool Integration". It worked well for me. The > > initial> > version of the plug-in was built upon what I got after following > > the tutorial> > step by step.> >> > Somebody said "Managed Build System Extensibility Document" is the > > bible> > for CDT plug-in development, and I believed it. In fact this > > document plus> > "What's New in CDT Build System 4.0" are the only 2 documents that> > guided me for the developement of initial RTEMS plug-in.> > Yah, I've been through the "MBS Extensibility" doc, and it *is* the > "bible" for CDT plugin development. But, there are other good sources > too, the CDT sources being an example. Another is the CDT extension > point reference docs:> > http://help.eclipse.org/help33/index.jsp?topic=/ > org.eclipse.cdt.doc.isv/reference/extension-points/index.html> > Although these refer to eclipse 3.3, they are still very much > relevant to the CDT as found in eclipse 3.4.> > > Although I don't know how actually Sebastian plan to do it, I think > > if we can> > automatically extract settings/configurations from Makefiles generated> > by configure process, it's an improvement over the current one > > since it'd> > require less user input.> > That approach implies some type of parser is required. I'm sure > Sebastian will communicate his ideas here as soon as he's able.> > Only a couple of years ago, the CDT had two types of projects: > Managed Build and Standard Makefile. Both are still present, only in > a more refined form. Managed build projects construct Makefiles > automatically, while Standard Makefile projects simply rely on the > user to provide a (Makefile-based) build system.> > The RTEMS-Eclipse plugin I was designing would utilize the RTEMS > makefile templates, Makefile.leaf, Makefile.lib, and Makefile.dir > (found in ${RTEMS_INSTALL_LOCATION}/make/Templates), *in conjuction* > with user-provided values like executable name, etc.> > However, upon closer analysis, it became clear that in order to > maintain a useful degree of independence from the RTEMS build-system > and maximum flexibility, the Managed Build approach is *the* way to go.> > > One other improvement I can see is to make it work on Linux and Mac.> > It seems we 3 have right mix of environments: I have Windows one, > > Sebastian> > has openSuSE 10.3 env and you have Mac env.> > Having the plugin work across the 3, main OSes is not just an > improvement, it's a *necessity * :-)> > Of course, we should strive for OS-independence as much as possible...> > I would also lump RTEMS target arch and BSP selection as necessities.> > > I assume that we cannot get all we want in one shot, so one of many > > possible> > ways to move forward is:> >> > 1. Make the 1st version work in Linux and Mac; Once it works in one > > OS, re-test> > it in the other OS until we get one version that works in each > > of the 3 OS. We> > then use it as a comman base for further refinement.> >> > 2. Add new improvements one by one. After one new feature works in > > one OS,> > re-test the new plug-in in the other OS. We go through this > > iterative process> > until we think we have all necessary features.> > Yes. An iterative development scheme is the only way to go.> > We need to get a solid base to build upon. First focusing on the > basic toolchain elements: assembler, c/c++ compiler & linker, > archiver. Debugger and Launch configs are almost as important. But we > have to be able to build something to run and debug first :-)> > I'm still studying your plugin trying to get up to speed... thanks > again.> > >> >> > > From: daronchabot at gmail.com> > > Subject: plugin first steps> > > Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:05:17 -0600> > > To: robert.fu at live.com> > > CC: sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de; rtems-users at rtems.org> > >> > > Robert,> > >> > > Thanks for your contribution. It looks like a good place to start.> > >> > > I sent the link below to Sebastian in an earlier email.> > >> > > If you have not already done so, I recommend checking out the cdt- > > all> > > CVS module from the Eclipse repo. You can find directions here:> > >> > > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Getting_started_with_CDT_development> > >> > > The best place to learn how things work is the reference> > > implementations contained in the "cdt-all" CVS module.> > >> > > If you and Sebastian have no objections, I'd like to remove the> > > unused library dependencies from the plugin's ".settings" file,> > > partly to see if I can commit to the RTEMS cvs repo and partly to> > > clean things up a bit.> > >> > > Those dependencies are:> > > 1) org.eclipse.cdt.core.lrparser_5.0.1.200809120802.jar> > > 2) org.eclipse.cdt.core.parser.upc_5.0.0.200809120802.jar> > >> > >> > > -- dc> > > _______________________________________________> > > rtems-users mailing list> > > rtems-users at rtems.com> > > http://rtems.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-us> >> > Get more done, have more fun, and stay more connected with Windows > > Mobile®. See how.> > _______________________________________________> rtems-users mailing list> rtems-users at rtems.com> http://rtems.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
_________________________________________________________________
Proud to be a PC? Show the world. Download the “I’m a PC” Messenger themepack now.
hthttp://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/119642558/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20081122/588d2a7d/attachment.html>


More information about the users mailing list