about SPARC_HAS_FPU = 1

Aleix Conchillo Flaqué aconchillo at ieec.cat
Fri Oct 17 12:03:00 UTC 2008

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 13:41, Ralf Corsepius <ralf.corsepius at rtems.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 12:37 +0200, pierre kestener wrote:
>> Hello,
>> i have read some messages in this list from Jiri Gaisler in March 2008 :
>> http://www.rtems.com/ml/rtems-users/2008/march/msg00272.html
>> stating that one should always have
>> #define SPARC_HAS_FPU 1
>> It seems that this patch has not been integrated in mainline RTEMS sources.
>> Is there a reason or has this just been forgotten ?
> I don't recall the details, but to me this patch is simply wrong.

Which one? The one I proposed initially (before Jiri answers) is
wrong, yes. I think Pierre is referring to the one from Jiri where
SPARCH_HAS_FPU is always 1.


More information about the users mailing list