Problem with TCP socket on RTEMS 4.8.1 (ARM BSP)

[Joel Sherrill]

Gene Smith wrote:
> Alex Zolotov wrote, On 09/01/2008 01:41 AM:
>   
>> Thank you.
>> It seems, that problem same as described by Gene Smith
>> (http://www.rtems.com/ml/rtems-users/2008/august/msg00073.html) in his
>> post "Little Endian ARM fails on 1st TCP datagram". The reason is that
>> BYTE_ORDER BIG_ENDIAN defined during compiling TCP functions.
>>
>>     
>
> Yes, this BYTE_ORDER macro seems to be a current problem at least for
> ARM. Also mentioned in the previous thread.  -gene
>
>   
Just to beat this one into submission.  Are we are running the
ARM in big or little endian mode?

If little endian, then the compiler has the correct predefine.

/opt/rtems-4.10/bin/arm-rtems4.10-gcc
#define __ARMEL__ 1
/opt/rtems-4.6/bin/arm-rtems-gcc
#define __ARMEL__ 1
/opt/rtems-4.7/bin/arm-rtems4.7-gcc
#define __ARMEL__ 1
/opt/rtems-4.8/bin/arm-rtems4.8-gcc
#define __ARMEL__ 1
/opt/rtems-4.9/bin/arm-rtems4.9-gcc
#define __ARMEL__ 1

Where is the breakdown?

--joel
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-users mailing list
> rtems-users at rtems.com
> http://rtems.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>   


-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
   Support Available             (256) 722-9985