rtems_iterate_over_all_threads

Leon Pollak leonp at plris.com
Wed Apr 22 16:58:38 UTC 2009


On Wednesday April 22 2009, Manuel Coutinho wrote:
> My 2 cents, if I may :) =>
>
>   Why not make that task (that does the urgent job) with a high priority?
> It seams the standard way of increasing responsiveness while allowing
> interrupts and task switching

Because when, for example, doing I/O, the urgent task will allow task 
switching, and this will change the situation, which is unacceptable.
The urgent task must process the "snapshot" of the moment it was started at.

Thanks.
Leon


-- 
            Dr.Leon M.Pollak
                Director
       PLR Information Systems Ltd.
Tel.:+972-98657670  |  POB 8130, H'Aomanut 9,
Fax.:+972-98657621  |  Poleg Industrial Zone,
Mob.:+972-544739246 |  Netanya, 42160, Israel.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090422/890d356d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the users mailing list