4.10 Approaching

[Kate Feng]

Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Till Straumann wrote:
>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>  
>>> On 09/30/2009 06:54 PM, Kate Feng wrote:
>>>    
>>>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>>      
>>>>> On 09/30/2009 05:36 PM, Feng, Kate wrote:
>>>>>        
>>>>>>> This is fixed in 4.4.2 as far as I know.
>>>>>>>             
>>>>>> I can not find the source for gcc-4.4.2 at
>>>>>> http://www.rtems.org/ftp/pub/rtems/SOURCES/
>>>>>> or at
>>>>>> http://www.rtems.org/ftp/pub/rtems/SOURCES/4.10/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any pointer would be highly appreciated.
>>>>>>           
>>>>> Sebastian's reply was misleading.
>>>>> gcc-4.4.2 has not been released.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ralf
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>> Perhaps, should I use gcc-4.4.0-RC ?
>>>>       
>>> No, the current rtems4.10 gcc is gcc-4.4.1 (The latest official gcc 
>>> release).
>>>
>>>    
>>>> How about binutils-2.19.51-20090222.tar.bz2 ? Is it the latest one ?
>>>> I guess it includes binutils-2.19.1 and all the patches for it, 
>>>> right ?
>>>>       
>>> No, rtems-4.10 currently is using binutils-2.19.90, the latest 
>>> snapshot of the upcoming binutils-2.20 (to be released in very near 
>>> future, not unlikely this week)
>>>
>>>    
>>>> Please advise.
>>>>       
>>> Are using home-grown toolchains based on the contents of 
>>> ftp://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/SOURCES/4.10 ?
>>>     
>> E.g., we are here.
>>
>> IMO, prior to even thinking about cutting 4.10
>> the toolchain versions, patches etc. should be defined, frozen and
>> published (as source-code, not only binary releases).
>>
>>   
> These will be available once gdb and binutils make their
> releases.  
And the version Ralf mentioned for gcc-4.4.1 is not posted as well.
I agree with Till that the toolchain versions should be more or less
well defined and frozen in order to cut the 4.10. There are so many
tool versions in http://www.rtems.org/ftp/pub/rtems/SOURCES/4.10/
that I am very confused. 

Cheers,
Kate
> Ralf is working hard to keep up with their release
> candidates so we have feedback.  I have also been reporting
> on both.
>> Once we have the final tools then we can build + test 4.10 release
>> candidates.
>>
>>   
> Do you mean build the tools or RTEMS?  Except for the newlib
> patch revisions, the others are pretty independent of the
> RTEMS source code.
>
> --joel
>> WKR
>> -- Till
>>  
>>> Its contents is a bit outdated, I haven't managed to keep it 
>>> uptodate, because the rapid development binutils, newlib and gdb 
>>> currently are subject of kept me busy otherwise (building binary 
>>> toolchains).
>>>
>>> Which OS are you using? May-be the toolchain you need already exists 
>>> pre-built.
>>>
>>> Ralf
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtems-users mailing list
>>> rtems-users at rtems.org
>>> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>>>     
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtems-users mailing list
>> rtems-users at rtems.org
>> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>>   
>
>