4.10 Approaching

Till Straumann strauman at slac.stanford.edu
Wed Sep 30 17:48:52 UTC 2009


Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 09/30/2009 06:54 PM, Kate Feng wrote:
>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> On 09/30/2009 05:36 PM, Feng, Kate wrote:
>>>>> This is fixed in 4.4.2 as far as I know.
>>>> I can not find the source for gcc-4.4.2 at
>>>> http://www.rtems.org/ftp/pub/rtems/SOURCES/
>>>> or at
>>>> http://www.rtems.org/ftp/pub/rtems/SOURCES/4.10/
>>>>
>>>> Any pointer would be highly appreciated.
>>> Sebastian's reply was misleading.
>>> gcc-4.4.2 has not been released.
>>>
>>> Ralf
>>>
>> Perhaps, should I use gcc-4.4.0-RC ?
> No, the current rtems4.10 gcc is gcc-4.4.1 (The latest official gcc 
> release).
>
>> How about binutils-2.19.51-20090222.tar.bz2 ? Is it the latest one ?
>> I guess it includes binutils-2.19.1 and all the patches for it, right ?
> No, rtems-4.10 currently is using binutils-2.19.90, the latest 
> snapshot of the upcoming binutils-2.20 (to be released in very near 
> future, not unlikely this week)
>
>> Please advise.
> Are using home-grown toolchains based on the contents of 
> ftp://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/SOURCES/4.10 ?
E.g., we are here.

IMO, prior to even thinking about cutting 4.10
the toolchain versions, patches etc. should be defined, frozen and
published (as source-code, not only binary releases).

Once we have the final tools then we can build + test 4.10 release
candidates.

WKR
-- Till
>
> Its contents is a bit outdated, I haven't managed to keep it uptodate, 
> because the rapid development binutils, newlib and gdb currently are 
> subject of kept me busy otherwise (building binary toolchains).
>
> Which OS are you using? May-be the toolchain you need already exists 
> pre-built.
>
> Ralf
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-users mailing list
> rtems-users at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users




More information about the users mailing list