Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks
chrisj at rtems.org
Fri Feb 19 00:54:09 UTC 2010
On 2/19/2010 11:31 AM, Eric Norum wrote:
> The patch looks like a good idea, but even without it I think that it's safe
> to have the other task perform a socket shutdown which will then
> read in the first task to return an error, right?
I am not sure. I cannot remember if I tried the shutdown call. I seem to
remember there being a problem but I am not sure what it was. I know an
accept and close was a problem.
> The first task would then take care of closing the socket itself.
Yes if the shutdown works.
More information about the users