Coverage Analysis Reporter Updated

[Aleix Conchillo Flaqué]

Adding a header or footer per file in the annotation would be useful as well.

Aleix

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 17:40, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
<aconchillo at ice.csic.es> wrote:
> This is great work, thank you.
>
> Just a minor comment: what about having separate annotated files
> instead of a single html file with internal references in the coverage
> report? Of course, annotations for a single file would use the same
> file with references (like now).
>
> Aleix
>
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 15:58, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Jennifer has worked very hard on enhancing the
>> reports available from the Coverage Analysis
>> Reporter.  There are a few issues left to address
>> but things look pretty good.  This version
>> has:
>>
>> + Text Reports
>> + HTML Reports with sortable tables
>> + Branch Taken/Not Taken Reports
>>  - x86, lm32, powerpc, and coldfire
>> + Per Method Coverage Summary Report
>>
>> The top URL is:
>>
>> http://www.rtems.org/ftp/pub/rtems/people/joel/coverage/
>>
>> You are looking at reports dated 21 May and 22 May.  It
>> takes ~24 hours to generate a full set of reports.
>>
>> Please review and make comments.  This infrastructure
>> is an important part of the RTEMS Project.
>>
>> --joel
>> _
>