Strict aliasing and chains revisited
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Wed Oct 20 13:52:42 UTC 2010
Hello,
some time ago there was a discussion about strict aliasing problems in
combination with RTEMS chains:
http://www.rtems.com/ml/rtems-users/2006/november/msg00096.html
The basic problem shows up here:
http://www.rtems.com/ml/rtems-users/2006/november/msg00154.html
Unfortunately I was not able to figure out what action fixed the strict
aliasing problems. We don't use the -fno-strict-aliasing option currently and
don't suffer from aliasing problems so it seems to be fixed somehow.
I started to clean up the chain implementation a bit. I changed it such that
the only functions using fields of Chain_Control are:
_Chain_Head()
_Chain_Tail()
All other functions work with Chain_Node pointers.
This is still a hack since the Chain_Control has nothing to do with a
Chain_Node from a C standard perspective, but this should fix the aliasing
problems.
Please have a look at (patch):
https://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1711
During this work I fixed several chain API violations (direct usage of
structure fields) throughout the RTEMS sources and an old comment showed up (in
'cpukit/score/src/watchdoginsert.c'):
restart:
delta_interval = the_watchdog->initial;
/*
* We CANT use _Watchdog_First() here, because a TICK interrupt
* could modify the chain during the _ISR_Flash() below. Hence,
* the header is pointing to volatile data. The _Watchdog_First()
* INLINE routine (but not the macro - note the subtle difference)
* casts away the 'volatile'...
*
* Also, this is only necessary because we call no other routine
* from this piece of code, hence the compiler thinks it's safe to
* cache *header!!
*
* Till Straumann, 7/2003 (gcc-3.2.2 -O4 on powerpc)
*
*/
for ( after = (Watchdog_Control *) ((volatile Chain_Control *)header)->first ;
;
after = _Watchdog_Next( after ) ) {
if ( delta_interval == 0 || !_Watchdog_Next( after ) )
break;
if ( delta_interval < after->delta_interval ) {
after->delta_interval -= delta_interval;
break;
}
delta_interval -= after->delta_interval;
/*
* If you experience problems comment out the _ISR_Flash line.
* 3.2.0 was the first release with this critical section redesigned.
* Under certain circumstances, the PREVIOUS critical section algorithm
* used around this flash point allowed interrupts to execute
* which violated the design assumptions. The critical section
* mechanism used here WAS redesigned to address this.
*/
_ISR_Flash( level );
if ( the_watchdog->state != WATCHDOG_BEING_INSERTED ) {
goto exit_insert;
}
if ( _Watchdog_Sync_level > insert_isr_nest_level ) {
_Watchdog_Sync_level = insert_isr_nest_level;
goto restart;
}
}
This volatile cast was added 2003-07-18 to fix a synchronization problem with
ISRs. I think that this fix is obsolete since 2006-03-07 because _ISR_Flash()
uses now a compiler memory barrier. Proposed patch:
Index: score/src/watchdoginsert.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr1/CVS/rtems/cpukit/score/src/watchdoginsert.c,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.10 watchdoginsert.c
--- score/src/watchdoginsert.c 17 Aug 2005 22:49:56 -0000 1.10
+++ score/src/watchdoginsert.c 20 Oct 2010 13:23:27 -0000
@@ -59,21 +59,7 @@
restart:
delta_interval = the_watchdog->initial;
- /*
- * We CANT use _Watchdog_First() here, because a TICK interrupt
- * could modify the chain during the _ISR_Flash() below. Hence,
- * the header is pointing to volatile data. The _Watchdog_First()
- * INLINE routine (but not the macro - note the subtle difference)
- * casts away the 'volatile'...
- *
- * Also, this is only necessary because we call no other routine
- * from this piece of code, hence the compiler thinks it's safe to
- * cache *header!!
- *
- * Till Straumann, 7/2003 (gcc-3.2.2 -O4 on powerpc)
- *
- */
- for ( after = (Watchdog_Control *) ((volatile Chain_Control *)header)->first ;
+ for ( after = _Watchdog_First( header ) ;
;
after = _Watchdog_Next( after ) ) {
@@ -87,15 +73,6 @@
delta_interval -= after->delta_interval;
- /*
- * If you experience problems comment out the _ISR_Flash line.
- * 3.2.0 was the first release with this critical section redesigned.
- * Under certain circumstances, the PREVIOUS critical section algorithm
- * used around this flash point allowed interrupts to execute
- * which violated the design assumptions. The critical section
- * mechanism used here WAS redesigned to address this.
- */
-
_ISR_Flash( level );
if ( the_watchdog->state != WATCHDOG_BEING_INSERTED ) {
Have a nice day!
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 18 90 80 79-6
Fax : +49 89 18 90 80 79-9
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the users
mailing list