Capture Engine questions

[Robert S. Grimes]

What is the status of the Capture Engine?

I ask because of two issues I've discovered.

1. If I am using the RTEMS shell, I don't want to
use the rtems_monitor, right?  The shell supercedes
the monitor in this case, is that correct?  It seems
to work, though no mention is made of that usage on
the Wiki...

2. The task name is not being reported correctly.
Using RTEMS 4.9 and the rtems_monitor, I get the
following from ctlist:

1-rtems $ ctlist
total 13
 0a01000a   90  90  90 DELAY a---   0%   0% (15)
 0a010007   30  30  30 Wevnt a---   0%   0% (5)
 0a01000c   80  80  80 Wmsg a---   0%   0% (3)
 0a010014   11  11  11 WRATE a---   0%   0% (9542)
 0a010004  100 100 100 Wevnt a---   0%   0% (17)
 0a010018   10  10  10 WRATE a---   0%   0% (1983)
 0a010010   80  80  80 READY a---   0%   0% (2)
 0a010002  100 100 100 Wevnt a---   0%   0% (64)
 0a010019  100 100 100 DELAY a---   0%   0% (9809)
 09010001  255 255 255 READY a---   0%   0% (172135)
 0a010001  120 120 120 READY a---   0%   0% (5)
 0a010011   80  80  80 READY a---   0%   0% (233)
 0a01000b    1   1   1 READY a---   0%   0% (68596)

Using RTEMS 4.10 and the shell, I get the following
output (different sets of tasks, of course, and
different BSPs, virtex and leon3, respectively):

SHLL [/] # ctlist
total 5
 0a010003 @G�  10  10  10 Wmsg a--g   0%   0% (0)
 0a010002 @G�  10  10  10 Wmsg a--g   0%   0% (0)
 09010001 @G� 255 255 255 READY a--g   0%   0%
(12332)
 0a010005 @G�@
               �(@G�   1   1   1 Wmsg a--g
0%   0% (0)
 0a010006 @G�@
               �(@G� 100 100 100 READY a--g %
`.
Am I missing something here?

Thanks,
-Bob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110426/f48039a8/attachment.html>