RTEMS Developers List is available.

[Joel Sherrill]

On 12/03/2011 03:54 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 3/12/11 4:25 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> A step, you apparently executed without informing the RTEMS SC in
>> advance and without letting the SC having decided upon this step.
> As others have noted the discussion happened in public. I see no reason
> for the SC being involved.
Agreed.
>> A step, I vehemently disagree withand a step I vehemently disagree with
>> how it was done.
> The whole process has taken place in public and I assumed anyone on the
> SC would be prepared to make any comments publicly. It is just a mailing
> list we are discussing.
>
> I started the process of a new list for a few reasons. The most
> important is the need to provide a mailing list for review of patches
> before committing. This became important because you requested, and it
> was agreed, that Gedare be given commit after review, something this
> project has never had. We have no defined procedure or protocol for
> commit access in this way. No one stepped up to resolve this situation
> so I started this process. Without this happening Gedare was given
> something he did not know how to use. We should being doing everything
> we can to welcome and encourage new committers to RTEMS.
This also follows the practice of other large free software projects.
Many projects have a developer, patches, and user help list.
>
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-users mailing list
> rtems-users at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users


-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research&  Development
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
    Support Available             (256) 722-9985