rtems git status...

Ralf Corsepius ralf.corsepius at rtems.org
Wed Jan 26 14:09:29 UTC 2011


On 01/26/2011 02:04 PM, Daron Chabot wrote:
> I have been using git to track the RTEMS cvs repo for quite a while now.
> However, some of the branch structure looks weird:
>
> (~/RTEMS/rtems.mirror.git)
> djc at TooLBox-->  git branch -a
>    B_beatnik_import_from_SLAC
>    B_rtems_mvme3100_bsp_slac
>    MOVED-ASM_H-TO-RTEMS-SUBDIR-4-6-branch
>    MOVED-FROM-C-SRC-EXEC-TO-CPUKIT-rtems-eng-200108xx
>    MOVED-FROM-C-SRC-TO-CPUKIT-rtems-4-5-branch
>    MOVED-FROM-LIBBSP-TO-LIBCHIP-rtems-4-6-branch
>    MOVED-FROM-SCORE-TO-RTEMS-rtems-4-6-branch
>    MOVED-FTPD-TO-CPUKIT-4-5-branch
>    MOVED-RTEMS_WEBSERVER-TO-CPUKIT-HTTPD-4-5-branch
>    MOVED-TO-LIBCPU-4-6-branch
>    MOVED-from-C-SRC-TO-CPUKIT-rtems-4-5-branch
>    MOVED-from-C-SRC-TO-CPUKIT-rtems-4-6-branch
>    OAR
>    SLAC
> * master
>    origin
>    rtems-4-0-0-branch
>    rtems-4-10-branch
>    rtems-4-5-branch
>    rtems-4-6-branch
>    rtems-4-7-branch
>    rtems-4-8-branch
>    rtems-4-8-testing
>    rtems-4-9-branch
>    rtems-am-branch
>    rtems-eng-200108xx
>    rtemsdoc-4-5-branch
>    shttpd
>    zlib
>
> I'm also of the opinion that I don't really care about the old branches...

Well, I do (at least to some extent, because being able to track can 
easily become important.

However, I care much more about git clones producing incorrect results 
on active branches. This at least so far has always happened with my git 
conversion attempts.

Ralf





More information about the users mailing list