rtems git status...

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 01/26/2011 02:04 PM, Daron Chabot wrote:
> I have been using git to track the RTEMS cvs repo for quite a while now.
> However, some of the branch structure looks weird:
>
> (~/RTEMS/rtems.mirror.git)
> djc at TooLBox-->  git branch -a
>    B_beatnik_import_from_SLAC
>    B_rtems_mvme3100_bsp_slac
>    MOVED-ASM_H-TO-RTEMS-SUBDIR-4-6-branch
>    MOVED-FROM-C-SRC-EXEC-TO-CPUKIT-rtems-eng-200108xx
>    MOVED-FROM-C-SRC-TO-CPUKIT-rtems-4-5-branch
>    MOVED-FROM-LIBBSP-TO-LIBCHIP-rtems-4-6-branch
>    MOVED-FROM-SCORE-TO-RTEMS-rtems-4-6-branch
>    MOVED-FTPD-TO-CPUKIT-4-5-branch
>    MOVED-RTEMS_WEBSERVER-TO-CPUKIT-HTTPD-4-5-branch
>    MOVED-TO-LIBCPU-4-6-branch
>    MOVED-from-C-SRC-TO-CPUKIT-rtems-4-5-branch
>    MOVED-from-C-SRC-TO-CPUKIT-rtems-4-6-branch
>    OAR
>    SLAC
> * master
>    origin
>    rtems-4-0-0-branch
>    rtems-4-10-branch
>    rtems-4-5-branch
>    rtems-4-6-branch
>    rtems-4-7-branch
>    rtems-4-8-branch
>    rtems-4-8-testing
>    rtems-4-9-branch
>    rtems-am-branch
>    rtems-eng-200108xx
>    rtemsdoc-4-5-branch
>    shttpd
>    zlib
>
> I'm also of the opinion that I don't really care about the old branches...

Well, I do (at least to some extent, because being able to track can 
easily become important.

However, I care much more about git clones producing incorrect results 
on active branches. This at least so far has always happened with my git 
conversion attempts.

Ralf