(Yet another) RTEMS License Question
Cristian Paul Peñaranda Rojas
paul at kristianpaul.org
Fri Jul 8 13:34:07 UTC 2011
> I understand that any product sold or distributed containing an
> unmodified RTEMS release does not have to make available the source
> code of the application. This is clear from reading the license.
Sorry, but, WHAT?
You mean this  license?
So you cluded that from readint the GNU GPL?
> However, what is not clear is if there is a requirement to inform
> the customer that RTEMS is present and make available on demand the
> unmodified RTEMS code used in the product?
> Assuming that the answer to the above question is that the
> unmodified RTEMS code tree doesn't have to be provided, what if
Okay i still dont get it
> creation of the RTEMS application also requires a new or modified
> BSP, libcpu or other change to internal GPL licensed RTEMS files
> that are not yet or never become a part of an official RTEMS release
> or tree? Does this possibly trigger a requirement to make available
> to customers this modified RTEMS tree used in the product?
> rtems-users mailing list
> rtems-users at rtems.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the users