Any issues to address before 4.10.1?

[Till Straumann]

On 07/13/2011 01:09 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On 07/13/2011 12:50 PM, Till Straumann wrote:
>> What about 1775? This is pretty obvious.
>>
> Yeah. This is in the "easy to trust" and
> "ready to apply" category.
>
> Does it apply to 4.9 as well?

No. The bug was introduced with changes  after 4.9 was branched.

T.
>
> --joel
>> T.
>>
>>
>> On 07/13/2011 12:43 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>> On 07/13/2011 12:19 PM, Till Straumann wrote:
>>>> I hope for 4.10.1 to be released soon, too.
>>>>
>>>> I would recommend PR1775 to be applied and maybe PR1710, too.
>>>>
>>> 1710 doesn't have a formal patch and needs some
>>> test code in the tree (at least on the head).
>>>
>>> One of the GSOC projects is a file system test suite
>>> and he has a number of minor file system issues.
>>> It sounds like he needs to provide a test for this
>>> case with mounted IMFS, RFS and DOSFS. That should
>>> shake this out.
>>>
>>> I am leaning to a 4.10.2 to catch the issues his
>>> fstest work has identified. This would be similar
>>> to the 4.6 release which fixed a number of parameter
>>> checking errors.
>>>
>>> --joel
>>>> WKR
>>>> -- Till
>>>>
>>>> On 07/13/2011 12:02 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>>> On 07/13/2011 11:13 AM, Till Straumann wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/12/2011 02:19 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I want to cut 4.10.1 but want to make sure
>>>>>>> everyone who has had PRs against 4.10.0 is
>>>>>>> happy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Feedback appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm going through my list (but am not quite done yet).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please stay posted
>>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not in a huge hurry but it has been Feb since
>>>>> 4.10.0 was released. And there have been some fixes.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.rtems.org/wiki/index.php/4.10_Release_Notes#Release_4.10.1_Changes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I was hoping to cut it late this week or early next
>>>>> week.
>>>>>
>>>>>> WKR
>>>>>> - T.
>>>
>
>