RTEMS developers list (rtems-devel)

[Gedare Bloom]

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:43 AM, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 11/09/2011 12:13 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
>>
>> Currently we can post to the rtems-vc list and discussions happen. This
>> fragments the discussion. What if I set set the reply-to field to a
>> patches
>> review list (when we have one) and block posting to the rtems-vc. The
>> purpose
>> is to cut down the number of places discussion takes place and users need
>> to
>> monitor.
>
> This is a good proposal.  I would use the following lists
>
>  o rtems-users,
>  o rtems-devel (also for patches, reply-to from rtems-vc),
>  o rtems-vc, and
>  o rtems-bugs.
>
I like this set of lists especially with making rtems-vc and
rtems-bugs as "no-reply" (read-only) lists. I would say to make both
vc and bugs have reply-to go to the rtems-devel. (Ideally no one
replies to rtems-bugs posts, but there might be some value in moving a
bug conversation into a mailing list discussion.)

-Gedare
> --
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
> Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone   : +49 89 18 90 80 79-6
> Fax     : +49 89 18 90 80 79-9
> E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> PGP     : Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-users mailing list
> rtems-users at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>