Starting with RTEMS

[Binkowski, Cassio]

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:

> On 2/03/12 8:21 AM, Binkowski, Cassio wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Andrei Chichak <groups at chichak.ca
>> <mailto:groups at chichak.ca>> wrote:
>>
>>    What was the response to the "which" commands?
>>
>> I got this:
>>
>>
>>    /$ which avr-rtems4.10-gcc/
>>    //opt/rtems-4.10/bin/avr-**rtems4.10-gcc.exe/
>>
>>
> Great.
>
>
>> Another one that seems to be working fine:
>>
>>    /$ type avr-rtems4.10-gcc/
>>    /avr-rtems4.10-gcc is /opt/rtems-4.10/bin/avr-**rtems4.10-gcc/
>>
>
> Looks ok. Well it did in your html email.
>
>  However, this is all I get when asking GCC to provide its details:
>>
>>    /$ avr-rtems4.10-gcc -v --version/
>>    /avr-rtems4.10-gcc.exe (GCC) 4.4.6 20110416 (RTEMS
>>    gcc-4.4.6-5.mgw/newlib-1.18.0-**/
>>    /28.mgw)/
>>    /Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc./
>>    /This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
>>      There is NO/
>>    /warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
>>    PURPOSE./
>>
>
>
> Have you cut off some of the output ?
>
> Nope. This is it. I know in the wiki it shows a lot more.


>
>
>> ... different from the one in the wiki
>> (http://www.rtems.org/wiki/**index.php/MinGW_Tools_for_**
>> Windows#RTEMS_Tools_**Installation<http://www.rtems.org/wiki/index.php/MinGW_Tools_for_Windows#RTEMS_Tools_Installation>
>> )
>>
>>
> The output I posted was for the SPARC architecture and not the AVR so this
> will be different. Also I used the 4.11 tools and not the 4.10 tools. They
> are different.
>
> RTEMS 4.10 is the current released version and is termed "stable". We only
> add bug fixes to this version and the tools do not change unless there is a
> bug fix we think is important.
>
> RTEMS 4.11 is the development version. This is always changing. It can be
> unstable and contain bugs. We add new features here. The tools are also
> newer and for this reason the tool details may vary.
>

Understood.

>
> If you wish to verify your set up I suggest you download the sparc
> architecture tools and execute the same commands I did.


Will do.

But so far you can't tell if anything is wrong, right?



>
>
> Chris
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120301/cf9dbfbc/attachment-0001.html>