Rtems-4.10.2 and RPC on PowerPC

[Kate Feng]

Hi Robert,

It works fine with me now.  You might need to increase the stack size of 
the RPC thread or others.
When I worked on Rtems-4.10.0, I increased the stack size on some 
threads in my application.
Somehow, when I loaded RTEMS4.10.2,  I mistakenly linked it with the 
older version of my application
, which had smaller stack size on some threads.

Hope that this helps.

Kate

On 10/19/2012 09:15 PM, rwas wrote:
> I have not tried to use the patch you provided.
>
> As soon as I was reasonably sure that 4.10.x had issues (and was not 
> my coding) I chose to step back to 4.9.3.
> At this point, my schedule is too tight to risk using 4.10.x. I would 
> like to help you
> debug 4.10, I just can't spend the time on it now.
>
> I do thank you for taking the time to help me on this Kate.
>
> Robert W.
>
> Kate Feng wrote:
>>  Is there anything wrong with the patch I sent yesterday for 4.10.0 ?
>>  Does it work for you in  4.10.0? We have used that code  for more
>>  than a year.
>>
>>  I debugged RTEM4.10.2 today.  It seems that the main issue is not
>>  related to the patch I sent or the code in RTEM4.10.2 (e.g.
>>  bootcard.c), although there are some discrepancies between the two.
>>  It seems that there are some bugs in the compiling tools for
>>  RTEMS-4.10.2 because malloc() does not behave the same as
>>  RTEMS-4.10.0 does, even though the relevant code are the same.
>>
>>  For both 4.10.0 and 4.10.2,  I used the gcc-core-4.4.6.tar.bz2 and
>>  gcc-g++-4.4.6.tar.bz2.
>>
>>  However, for  RTEMS4.10.0, I applied the patch
>>  gcc-core-4.4.6-rtems4.10-20110420.diff For  RTEMS4.10.2, I applied
>>  the patch gcc-core-4.4.6-rtems4.10-20110829.diff, and
>>  gcc-g++-4.4.6-rtems4.10-20110829.diff.
>>
>>  Thus, it might depends on which version of compiling tools you use
>>  for both RTEMS-4.10 and RTEMS-4.10.2.  Perhaps, the tools are not
>>  interchangeable between 4.10.0 and 4.10.2, which I did not test yet.
>>  Others might know these gcc tool patches better than me.
>>
>>  Hope this helps.
>>
>>  Cheers, Kate Feng
>>
>>  On 10/18/2012 07:24 PM, rwas wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Kate Feng wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Yes,  RTEMS4.10.1 and RTEMS4.10.2 still have bugs.
>> >
>> >
>> > Will these patches fix 4.10.2?
>> >
>> > If 4.10.2 is this buggy I may go back to 4.9. :(
>> >
>> > Thanks Kate.
>> >
>> > Robert W.
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________ rtems-users mailing
>> > list rtems-users at rtems.org
>> > http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>>
>>  _______________________________________________ rtems-users mailing
>>  list rtems-users at rtems.org
>>  http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>
>