Rtems-4.10.2 and RPC on PowerPC
feng at bnl.gov
Wed Nov 7 17:55:23 UTC 2012
It works fine with me now. You might need to increase the stack size of
the RPC thread or others.
When I worked on Rtems-4.10.0, I increased the stack size on some
threads in my application.
Somehow, when I loaded RTEMS4.10.2, I mistakenly linked it with the
older version of my application
, which had smaller stack size on some threads.
Hope that this helps.
On 10/19/2012 09:15 PM, rwas wrote:
> I have not tried to use the patch you provided.
> As soon as I was reasonably sure that 4.10.x had issues (and was not
> my coding) I chose to step back to 4.9.3.
> At this point, my schedule is too tight to risk using 4.10.x. I would
> like to help you
> debug 4.10, I just can't spend the time on it now.
> I do thank you for taking the time to help me on this Kate.
> Robert W.
> Kate Feng wrote:
>> Is there anything wrong with the patch I sent yesterday for 4.10.0 ?
>> Does it work for you in 4.10.0? We have used that code for more
>> than a year.
>> I debugged RTEM4.10.2 today. It seems that the main issue is not
>> related to the patch I sent or the code in RTEM4.10.2 (e.g.
>> bootcard.c), although there are some discrepancies between the two.
>> It seems that there are some bugs in the compiling tools for
>> RTEMS-4.10.2 because malloc() does not behave the same as
>> RTEMS-4.10.0 does, even though the relevant code are the same.
>> For both 4.10.0 and 4.10.2, I used the gcc-core-4.4.6.tar.bz2 and
>> However, for RTEMS4.10.0, I applied the patch
>> gcc-core-4.4.6-rtems4.10-20110420.diff For RTEMS4.10.2, I applied
>> the patch gcc-core-4.4.6-rtems4.10-20110829.diff, and
>> Thus, it might depends on which version of compiling tools you use
>> for both RTEMS-4.10 and RTEMS-4.10.2. Perhaps, the tools are not
>> interchangeable between 4.10.0 and 4.10.2, which I did not test yet.
>> Others might know these gcc tool patches better than me.
>> Hope this helps.
>> Cheers, Kate Feng
>> On 10/18/2012 07:24 PM, rwas wrote:
>> > Kate Feng wrote:
>> >> Yes, RTEMS4.10.1 and RTEMS4.10.2 still have bugs.
>> > Will these patches fix 4.10.2?
>> > If 4.10.2 is this buggy I may go back to 4.9. :(
>> > Thanks Kate.
>> > Robert W.
>> > _______________________________________________ rtems-users mailing
>> > list rtems-users at rtems.org
>> > http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>> _______________________________________________ rtems-users mailing
>> list rtems-users at rtems.org
More information about the users