Testing and Metrics Tools

[Binkowski, Cassio]

Also, for unit testing. Is CUnit suitable for RTEMS applications?

Cassio

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Binkowski, Cassio <cassioiks at gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks Domenico and Gedare.
> I will give preference to CCCC, for being open-source.
>
> Best regards
> Cassio
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>
>> For code metrics, I have also had some success with using CCCC [1,2].
>> Note that Understand is proprietary and has only a 30-day "free-use"
>> license. CCCC is open-source, but not actively maintained.
>>
>> [1] http://cccc.sourceforge.net/
>> [2] http://sourceforge.net/projects/cccc/
>>
>> -Gedare
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:24 PM,  <domenico.dileo at unina.it> wrote:
>> > Dear Cassio,
>> > For metric analysis you can use Understand
>> > http://www.scitools.com/download/index.php
>> >
>> >
>> > Quoting "Binkowski, Cassio" <cassioiks at gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >> Hi all
>> >>
>> >> I'm considering using tools for unit testing and metrics analysis
>> (McCabe
>> >> and Halstead) in my RTEMS project and I'm wondering if the community
>> has
>> >> any suggestions on this matter.
>> >> Freeware/open source tools are preferable.
>> >>
>> >> Best regards
>> >> Cassio
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Domenico Di Leo, PhD student, Universit? degli Studi di Napoli Federico
>> II
>> > Ph:     +39 081 676770
>> > Fax:    +39 081 676574
>> > Web: http://wpage.unina.it/domenico.dileo
>> >
>> > Domenico Di Leo, PhD student, Universit? degli Studi di Napoli Federico
>> II
>> > Ph:     +39 081 676770
>> > Fax:    +39 081 676574
>> > Web: http://wpage.unina.it/domenico.dileo
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rtems-users mailing list
>> > rtems-users at rtems.org
>> > http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121015/4d8c2476/attachment.html>